Michelle Bray, Chair of the Oshawa Town & Gown Committee and Vice President of Windfield Farms Community Association, has posted an update that outlines the plans of the Student Housing Task Force. (I have also attached a PDF of the update.) The following quotations are excerpts from the post. The commentary is my own.
“The R1 zoned neighbourhoods around UOIT should be restored to their original intent – low-density residential (not commercial or economic) single-housekeeping establishments.”
This statement means that all student rental housing will be phased out. This is discriminatory. Furthermore, it is in direct contradiction to the warnings (first letter, second letter) given by the Chief Commissioner of the Ontario Human Right Commission stating that these actions could have human rights implications.
“The Residential Rental Units Licensing Bylaw will only grant licenses to those houses operating as traditional rentals rather than lodging houses. If a property is found to be operating in contravention of the Zoning Bylaw, such as being a lodging house (where individual bedrooms are being rented out or used exclusively by an individual lodger with shared washroom and cooking facilities), the house will not receive a license and cannot be rented.”
This paragraph clearly states the true purpose of the current Licensing Residential Rental Units Bylaw; Systematically eliminate all student housing from the neighbourhoods surrounding UOIT.
“Resident representatives had to acknowledge that these rental properties/lodging houses cannot be denied licenses without alternative housing being provided to the tenants, in order to ensure a housing crisis isn’t created.”
This solution is overwhelmingly unsatisfactory. What they are proposing is that students only have one option for housing: “purpose-built housing.” Effectively, this singular option means that students no longer have the right to move to and take up residence wherever they choose, as guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Section 6. Mobility Rights, Subsection (2).
Moreover, a singular source of housing eliminates competition. Basic economics show us that monopolies and restricted competition leads to higher prices.
Again, I call for a balanced plan that is a compromise between all parties. The current plan is lopsided.